FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson Weighs in on Meta Antitrust Trial

The FTC is taking Meta to court over claims that it surpassed competition by buying Instagram and WhatsApp and now has control over nearly 3 billion users combined. In this regard, FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson argues that these purchases hurt innovation. The stakes are high and Ferguson’s stance can really shape the future of Meta. So, everyone is looking for the trial outcome. Here’s what we know about:

FTC vs Meta: What This Case Is Really About

The FTC (Federal Trade Commission) is suing Meta that owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp till the date. Basically, this lawsuit started when FTC realized that Meta has become too powerful in the social media world. So, they claim Meta has been surpassing the competition by buying up popular companies rather than competing with them.

The FTC further wants to protect consumers and believes that they should have more choices about social media platforms.

Specifically, this case targets the purchase of Instagram and WhatsApp happened in 2012 and 2014, respectively by Meta. At first, the government allowed these purchases but years later, they found it as a tech monopoly. So, the FTC now says that these deals helped Meta build a social media empire that’s too big.

This lawsuit has been going on since 2020. It’s taken this long because of complex legal processes and Meta fighting back at every step. And now, the FTC under Chair Andrew Ferguson wants Meta to sell Instagram and WhatsApp.

Key Arguments of Ferguson Against Meta

FTC under Chair Andrew Ferguson brought valid proofs against meta and came up with the following arguments:

Ferguson says that Meta is following a “buy or bury” strategy. He further claims that Meta has a history of buying companies that might become more popular than Facebook. So, Meta isn’t making better products rather buying the competition that kills innovation and hurts users at the same time.

As an argument, Ferguson points to Instagram and WhatsApp purchase as a proof. Meta bought these companies when they were getting popular out there. So, he further strengthens his argument saying that this purchase is nothing but a clear sign that Meta wants to eliminate competitors.

Ferguson also argues that Meta uses our personal data unfairly. This is because when one company is controlling so many apps, it has huge amounts of information about us. This in turn gives Meta too much power over advertisers and users.

Overall, Ferguson says that Meta’s actions harm the entire tech market. As a result, new startups can’t compete because they know Meta will either copy them or buy them, leaving users with fewer options.

The Defense Strategy of Meta

Though FTC has valid arguments regarding tech monopoly, Meta is still fighting at its best. Here’s the Meta’s defense strategy:

Meta believes that they won fair and square. They argue that buying Instagram and WhatsApp was legal and good for users. Even the government approved these deals years ago. so, Meta thinks that it’s unfair to challenge them now.

Meta also mentions TikTok, Snapchat and other apps as proof that competition is alive and well. They further say that if they were truly a monopoly, these other platforms wouldn’t be so popular. In fact, users have plenty of choices for social media.

Meta also claims that they made Instagram and WhatsApp better after buying them. They invested money and added new features to make these apps much bigger than they could have on their own. So, this purchase helped users, not hurt them.

In short, Meta argues that breaking up their company would definitely harm users. This is because the integration between Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp creates a better experience. So, taking this apart would make things worse for the millions of people who use these apps every day.

The Instagram and WhatsApp Question

The purchase of Instagram and WhatsApp is the main target of this lawsuit. In fact, Meta bought Instagram in 2012 for $1 billion when it was just a small photo-sharing app. Not just this, Meta then bought WhatsApp in 2014 for $19 billion when it was becoming popular for messaging. But Andrew Ferguson claims that these weren’t normal business deals, in fact these were strategic moves to eliminate competition.

Besides just arguing, Ferguson further points to internal emails and documents that show the worries of Mark Zuckerberg about these apps. In these messages, Zuckerberg allegedly described Instagram as a threat that could “hurt us meaningfully.” So, this proves that Meta bought these companies to kill competition, not to improve them.

Now, the big question is whether the FTC could undone these purchases many years later. In short, Ferguson believes this would restore competition, but Meta argues that it’s impossible to unscramble the egg after so many years of integration.

What Ferguson Said About Data Monopoly?

Ferguson believes that data is the real power of Meta. This is because it controls data coming from billions of users through Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. So, it creates a data monopoly that gives Meta unfair advantages.

According to Ferguson, Meta combines data from across its platforms to build detailed profiles of users. This helps them target ads with incredible precision. So, no new competitor can match this level of data that makes it difficult for startups to compete.

Ferguson also claims this data monopoly creates a harmful cycle as Meta either copies the features of competitor applications or purchases the companies outright. As a proof, Ferguson points to Meta’s “copy and acquire” approach with Snapchat’s Stories feature.

Why the Case is Hyping Now After Many Years?

The purchase of Instagram and WhatsApp has been done years back. But things changed around 2019 when lawmakers and regulators started looking harder at big tech companies. So, the FTC began a new investigation into the past purchases of Meta. In December 2020, the FTC officially sued Meta claiming these acquisitions were part of a strategy to eliminate competition.

In turn, the case has moved slowly through the courts. Meanwhile, Meta tried to get the lawsuit thrown out but in January 2022, a judge allowed the claims of FTC to continue. Since then, both sides have gathered evidence and prepared their arguments. So, the trial is now moving forward with Andrew Ferguson leading the effort to prove Meta violated antitrust laws.

FTC Chair Against Meta Antitrust Trial: What’s Next?

This is the time when the FTC antitrust case against meta is at its critical point. So, everyone is looking for what will come next. The government accuses Meta of illegally bypassing competition while the company argues these deals not just benefited users but also aren’t anti-competitive.

However, the FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson stance can shape the outcome. So, the next phase of the trial will determine the future power of Meta as well as show how much power the government has to control corporate dominance.

What If Meta Loses?

The FTC wants to cut down the power of Meta, but what does that actually mean? If Meta loses, here’s what could happen: 

• Meta will have to sell Instagram and WhatsApp
• There would be stricter rules on future deals
• We can expect more lawsuits against other tech giants
• There will be no more integration of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp
• Smaller rivals could get a chance to grow  

Though this case isn’t over yet, a loss for Meta would shake up Big Tech forever.

What If Meta Wins?

If Meta defeats the FTC lawsuit, it could mean big things for the company and future antitrust cases. Here’s what to expect: 

• Meta will keep Instagram and WhatsApp
• It will be hard for FTC to sue other tech giants 
• Meta will keep buying smaller rivals
• There will be fewer restrictions on future deal
• Future antitrust cases will get weaker

In short, Meta win would be a major victory for Big Tech and a setback for regulators.

Final Words